<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Highest Circulation Print Publications &amp; .Com Traffic Comparison</title>
	<atom:link href="http://communikaytrix.com/2009/11/22/highest-circulation-print-publications-com-traffic-comparison/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://communikaytrix.com/2009/11/22/highest-circulation-print-publications-com-traffic-comparison/</link>
	<description>upfront commentary on pr, social media and communications</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 19:40:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary</title>
		<link>http://communikaytrix.com/2009/11/22/highest-circulation-print-publications-com-traffic-comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-408</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mary]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 05:45:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://communikaytrix.com/?p=348#comment-408</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This article has a nice content, it gives interesting ideas for the reader.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article has a nice content, it gives interesting ideas for the reader.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What role will digital content curation play in the future of PR? &#171; informationcurator</title>
		<link>http://communikaytrix.com/2009/11/22/highest-circulation-print-publications-com-traffic-comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-392</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[What role will digital content curation play in the future of PR? &#171; informationcurator]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 05:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://communikaytrix.com/?p=348#comment-392</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] read the USA Today. And more than 14 million visit the NY Times Web site each month (hat tip to Rachel Kay for the info). But, the key point here is the flattening that’s happened the last few years. Organizations now [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] read the USA Today. And more than 14 million visit the NY Times Web site each month (hat tip to Rachel Kay for the info). But, the key point here is the flattening that’s happened the last few years. Organizations now [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reillymorris</title>
		<link>http://communikaytrix.com/2009/11/22/highest-circulation-print-publications-com-traffic-comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-362</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[reillymorris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 00:31:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://communikaytrix.com/?p=348#comment-362</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great read Rachel!

So, if we assume that the staggering website traffic of the daily/weekly periodicals is due in part to the fact that the information they provide is highly time sensitive (a day from now that news can be stale- replaced with more news) - I can see why their respective web sites enjoy such visitation. 

However, that data on magazines does pose a different story. In all cases (save for BH&amp;G and NGM) the circulation numbers are more impressive. Why would we suppose that? Well, National Geographic is highly photogenic, so I can see why many flock there online (they have an entire section dedicated to wallpapers). BH&amp;G could be lumped into a similar category. I don&#039;t think we can overlook the amount of marketing these respective companies do for their online presence. For example, when was the last time you saw an ad for Reader&#039;s Digest Online? Perhaps the circulation revenues for RD are too highly profitable to push the online presence- as hard to believe as that might be? Perhaps corporate leadership of these companies is more conservative- more archaic? Or perhaps the readership of these magazines is simply loyal? My father has been getting NGM sent to his house since 1973. 

At any rate, really good read. Interesting numbers... perhaps one day we&#039;ll know why the data is what it is!  :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great read Rachel!</p>
<p>So, if we assume that the staggering website traffic of the daily/weekly periodicals is due in part to the fact that the information they provide is highly time sensitive (a day from now that news can be stale- replaced with more news) &#8211; I can see why their respective web sites enjoy such visitation. </p>
<p>However, that data on magazines does pose a different story. In all cases (save for BH&amp;G and NGM) the circulation numbers are more impressive. Why would we suppose that? Well, National Geographic is highly photogenic, so I can see why many flock there online (they have an entire section dedicated to wallpapers). BH&amp;G could be lumped into a similar category. I don&#8217;t think we can overlook the amount of marketing these respective companies do for their online presence. For example, when was the last time you saw an ad for Reader&#8217;s Digest Online? Perhaps the circulation revenues for RD are too highly profitable to push the online presence- as hard to believe as that might be? Perhaps corporate leadership of these companies is more conservative- more archaic? Or perhaps the readership of these magazines is simply loyal? My father has been getting NGM sent to his house since 1973. </p>
<p>At any rate, really good read. Interesting numbers&#8230; perhaps one day we&#8217;ll know why the data is what it is!  <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Highest Circulation Print Publications &#38; .Com Traffic Comparison &#8230; &#171; Blogging</title>
		<link>http://communikaytrix.com/2009/11/22/highest-circulation-print-publications-com-traffic-comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-357</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Highest Circulation Print Publications &#38; .Com Traffic Comparison &#8230; &#171; Blogging]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 08:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://communikaytrix.com/?p=348#comment-357</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] See more here:  Highest Circulation Print Publications &amp; .Com Traffic Comparison &#8230; [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] See more here:  Highest Circulation Print Publications &amp; .Com Traffic Comparison &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: communikaytrix</title>
		<link>http://communikaytrix.com/2009/11/22/highest-circulation-print-publications-com-traffic-comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-349</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[communikaytrix]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 02:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://communikaytrix.com/?p=348#comment-349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jason,

Thanks for your thoughts.  Yes, those are the highest circulation magazines! I can pretty much quote that as fact. It&#039;s based only on circulation. But yes, it would be great to really drill down on some of those stats.

Rachel]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason,</p>
<p>Thanks for your thoughts.  Yes, those are the highest circulation magazines! I can pretty much quote that as fact. It&#8217;s based only on circulation. But yes, it would be great to really drill down on some of those stats.</p>
<p>Rachel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: communikaytrix</title>
		<link>http://communikaytrix.com/2009/11/22/highest-circulation-print-publications-com-traffic-comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-348</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[communikaytrix]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 02:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://communikaytrix.com/?p=348#comment-348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alexis,

I agree with you that I often scan a Web site and quickly read the posts that attract me, but nothing engrosses me more than a nice hour long read of a fashion or entertainment pub. It&#039;s a shame we can&#039;t calculate more specifically time spent and where.

Rachel]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alexis,</p>
<p>I agree with you that I often scan a Web site and quickly read the posts that attract me, but nothing engrosses me more than a nice hour long read of a fashion or entertainment pub. It&#8217;s a shame we can&#8217;t calculate more specifically time spent and where.</p>
<p>Rachel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: communikaytrix</title>
		<link>http://communikaytrix.com/2009/11/22/highest-circulation-print-publications-com-traffic-comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-347</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[communikaytrix]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 02:23:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://communikaytrix.com/?p=348#comment-347</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bill,

Great thoughts  - thank you! I think it proves that we have to reevaluate how we measure PR efforts sometimes.  I like your thinking.

Rachel]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill,</p>
<p>Great thoughts  &#8211; thank you! I think it proves that we have to reevaluate how we measure PR efforts sometimes.  I like your thinking.</p>
<p>Rachel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Keath</title>
		<link>http://communikaytrix.com/2009/11/22/highest-circulation-print-publications-com-traffic-comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-344</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Keath]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 23:40:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://communikaytrix.com/?p=348#comment-344</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not surprised to see the NY Times dominating the web numbers. They are clearly the online leaders from newsprint. 

But are those really the top 10 US print magazines by circulation? Seems like lots of them are missing. Must be some other caveat to that list.

Nonetheless very cool to see the traffic/circulation numbers. Now tell me which numbers are more empty. How many of those newspapers are never read and how many of those website visitors are instant bounces? Wonder which numbers have the most accuracy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not surprised to see the NY Times dominating the web numbers. They are clearly the online leaders from newsprint. </p>
<p>But are those really the top 10 US print magazines by circulation? Seems like lots of them are missing. Must be some other caveat to that list.</p>
<p>Nonetheless very cool to see the traffic/circulation numbers. Now tell me which numbers are more empty. How many of those newspapers are never read and how many of those website visitors are instant bounces? Wonder which numbers have the most accuracy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitted by sdrosenb</title>
		<link>http://communikaytrix.com/2009/11/22/highest-circulation-print-publications-com-traffic-comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-343</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Twitted by sdrosenb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 20:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://communikaytrix.com/?p=348#comment-343</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] This post was Twitted by sdrosenb [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was Twitted by sdrosenb [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexis</title>
		<link>http://communikaytrix.com/2009/11/22/highest-circulation-print-publications-com-traffic-comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-342</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alexis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 17:23:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://communikaytrix.com/?p=348#comment-342</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very interesting to see this all laid out in one place. Thank you! For print circulations, it obviously isn&#039;t a surprise. While you cannot ignore the power of online news, you also have to look at who is reading what and where. From my own personal consumption habits, I may scan a paper quickly, but when I go to an outlet&#039;s Web site I am looking for something pretty specific--and if a brand, product or expert is in the article(s) I find, I am much more open to be influenced. 

The flip side of this for me personally is still magazines. While I prefer to gather my hard news online, nothing matches the feeling of sitting down with a thick magazine (such as Real Simple or InStyle) and pouring over each page, picture and article. While you didn&#039;t look at those in particular, overall it seems like magazines have still held the heart of some consumers. 

As always, great read!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting to see this all laid out in one place. Thank you! For print circulations, it obviously isn&#8217;t a surprise. While you cannot ignore the power of online news, you also have to look at who is reading what and where. From my own personal consumption habits, I may scan a paper quickly, but when I go to an outlet&#8217;s Web site I am looking for something pretty specific&#8211;and if a brand, product or expert is in the article(s) I find, I am much more open to be influenced. </p>
<p>The flip side of this for me personally is still magazines. While I prefer to gather my hard news online, nothing matches the feeling of sitting down with a thick magazine (such as Real Simple or InStyle) and pouring over each page, picture and article. While you didn&#8217;t look at those in particular, overall it seems like magazines have still held the heart of some consumers. </p>
<p>As always, great read!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

