<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: We’re Both on Twitter, So We Must be BFFs!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://communikaytrix.com/2009/10/27/we%e2%80%99re-both-on-twitter-so-we-must-be-bffs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://communikaytrix.com/2009/10/27/we%e2%80%99re-both-on-twitter-so-we-must-be-bffs/</link>
	<description>upfront commentary on pr, social media and communications</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 23:24:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cadence Turpin</title>
		<link>http://communikaytrix.com/2009/10/27/we%e2%80%99re-both-on-twitter-so-we-must-be-bffs/comment-page-1/#comment-307</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cadence Turpin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 08:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://communikaytrix.com/?p=327#comment-307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#039;ve made great observations about some of the deceit that lies in the promises of social media. Sure, these devices are ways to broaden relationships, but I think the largest tasks they have the ability to possess is maintaining relationships and staying informed. Twitter should not be used as a tool to beg for relationships...nobody will ever give you a second glance if you take that approach (in real life and on twitter, ha!). Twitter should be used as a reflection of values and RTing celebrity or upper crust figures with similar values is as close as we should get to name dropping. This just reinforces the idea that as long as you use social media to communicate honestly and with your publics&#039; interests in mind, your values will speak louder than any pleas for attention. Thanks for the blog post, helpful tips PR professionals should be implementing!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve made great observations about some of the deceit that lies in the promises of social media. Sure, these devices are ways to broaden relationships, but I think the largest tasks they have the ability to possess is maintaining relationships and staying informed. Twitter should not be used as a tool to beg for relationships&#8230;nobody will ever give you a second glance if you take that approach (in real life and on twitter, ha!). Twitter should be used as a reflection of values and RTing celebrity or upper crust figures with similar values is as close as we should get to name dropping. This just reinforces the idea that as long as you use social media to communicate honestly and with your publics&#8217; interests in mind, your values will speak louder than any pleas for attention. Thanks for the blog post, helpful tips PR professionals should be implementing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aubrey</title>
		<link>http://communikaytrix.com/2009/10/27/we%e2%80%99re-both-on-twitter-so-we-must-be-bffs/comment-page-1/#comment-304</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aubrey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 19:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://communikaytrix.com/?p=327#comment-304</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh, have fun on your trip! I&#039;m sure it&#039;ll be great, and it&#039;s always so nice to match the face with the tweets.  Be safe!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, have fun on your trip! I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;ll be great, and it&#8217;s always so nice to match the face with the tweets.  Be safe!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Weaver</title>
		<link>http://communikaytrix.com/2009/10/27/we%e2%80%99re-both-on-twitter-so-we-must-be-bffs/comment-page-1/#comment-303</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Weaver]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 19:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://communikaytrix.com/?p=327#comment-303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Note to self: Put pitch to Brian Williams on the back burner...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Note to self: Put pitch to Brian Williams on the back burner&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: communikaytrix</title>
		<link>http://communikaytrix.com/2009/10/27/we%e2%80%99re-both-on-twitter-so-we-must-be-bffs/comment-page-1/#comment-302</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[communikaytrix]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 01:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://communikaytrix.com/?p=327#comment-302</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tabitha,

Great points, and I certainly didn&#039;t intend for it to be a black and white issue. While the commenters have raised valid points, what I wanted to get across was that Twitter isn&#039;t an excuse to loose the decorum we&#039;ve always used when approaching press in the past.  Let&#039;s face it - the press knows we want something that they can offer, so a little respect can go along way. I do not believe shouting at someone publicly to attend or cover an event is an appropriate way to communicate a story. I think Twitter opens up the opportunity for a less respectful exchange.  

I&#039;m not sure where you took from my post that Internet relationships weren&#039;t meaningful, as I certainly didn&#039;t say that. If that were true, I wouldn&#039;t spend so much time nurturing relationships on Twitter. Aside from the media aspect, I consider anyone who approaches me on Twitter to have the upperhand. For example, if I&#039;m hiring and someone messages me about it on Twitter, I&#039;ll almost always give them an interview because I can tell they are paying attention to me. And I cherish some of the great friends I&#039;ve made - some of whom commented above.  This post was not about Internet relationships being invalid - it was about not harassing press (or celebrities) on Twitter. Very different.

Thanks for your thoughts!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tabitha,</p>
<p>Great points, and I certainly didn&#8217;t intend for it to be a black and white issue. While the commenters have raised valid points, what I wanted to get across was that Twitter isn&#8217;t an excuse to loose the decorum we&#8217;ve always used when approaching press in the past.  Let&#8217;s face it &#8211; the press knows we want something that they can offer, so a little respect can go along way. I do not believe shouting at someone publicly to attend or cover an event is an appropriate way to communicate a story. I think Twitter opens up the opportunity for a less respectful exchange.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure where you took from my post that Internet relationships weren&#8217;t meaningful, as I certainly didn&#8217;t say that. If that were true, I wouldn&#8217;t spend so much time nurturing relationships on Twitter. Aside from the media aspect, I consider anyone who approaches me on Twitter to have the upperhand. For example, if I&#8217;m hiring and someone messages me about it on Twitter, I&#8217;ll almost always give them an interview because I can tell they are paying attention to me. And I cherish some of the great friends I&#8217;ve made &#8211; some of whom commented above.  This post was not about Internet relationships being invalid &#8211; it was about not harassing press (or celebrities) on Twitter. Very different.</p>
<p>Thanks for your thoughts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: communikaytrix</title>
		<link>http://communikaytrix.com/2009/10/27/we%e2%80%99re-both-on-twitter-so-we-must-be-bffs/comment-page-1/#comment-301</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[communikaytrix]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 01:10:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://communikaytrix.com/?p=327#comment-301</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Aubrey,

Great example - thanks for sharing! It&#039;s great when Twitter connects us (even though you didn&#039;t know) but then we can move to next level by connecting in real life.  I&#039;m traveling to NY next week and will join more than 15 PR people I;ve only met on Twitter for a real life happy hour. I&#039;m so excited!

Rachel]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aubrey,</p>
<p>Great example &#8211; thanks for sharing! It&#8217;s great when Twitter connects us (even though you didn&#8217;t know) but then we can move to next level by connecting in real life.  I&#8217;m traveling to NY next week and will join more than 15 PR people I;ve only met on Twitter for a real life happy hour. I&#8217;m so excited!</p>
<p>Rachel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tabitha "Tabz" Smith</title>
		<link>http://communikaytrix.com/2009/10/27/we%e2%80%99re-both-on-twitter-so-we-must-be-bffs/comment-page-1/#comment-300</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tabitha "Tabz" Smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 00:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://communikaytrix.com/?p=327#comment-300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I really hate topics like this because it&#039;s so &quot;either/or&quot;... when in reality there&#039;s a lot more nuances to it than that.

I have, for a long time, advocated we need another term for social media relationships. Yes, you might not be my &quot;friend&quot;, but if you&#039;re reading my Twitter feed or following me you have a lot more likelihood of capturing my time and attention than some random person I meet at a mixer.

I&#039;ve found the opposite true. Especially recently when I was laid off. Sure there&#039;s some folks who I&#039;m only Twitter pals with, but some of them took the time to bug their actual friends and contacts for job leads. 

Same is true of some of the bloggers and members of the media I&#039;ve friended on Twitter. Sometimes they&#039;ll pick up a story faster because I&#039;ve been following and responding to other forms of communication.

It&#039;s all a matter of being a real person, not just trying to get your foot in the door. Establishing internet relationships may not be &quot;as good as the real thing&quot; but that&#039;s not to say it&#039;s completely invalid.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really hate topics like this because it&#8217;s so &#8220;either/or&#8221;&#8230; when in reality there&#8217;s a lot more nuances to it than that.</p>
<p>I have, for a long time, advocated we need another term for social media relationships. Yes, you might not be my &#8220;friend&#8221;, but if you&#8217;re reading my Twitter feed or following me you have a lot more likelihood of capturing my time and attention than some random person I meet at a mixer.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve found the opposite true. Especially recently when I was laid off. Sure there&#8217;s some folks who I&#8217;m only Twitter pals with, but some of them took the time to bug their actual friends and contacts for job leads. </p>
<p>Same is true of some of the bloggers and members of the media I&#8217;ve friended on Twitter. Sometimes they&#8217;ll pick up a story faster because I&#8217;ve been following and responding to other forms of communication.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s all a matter of being a real person, not just trying to get your foot in the door. Establishing internet relationships may not be &#8220;as good as the real thing&#8221; but that&#8217;s not to say it&#8217;s completely invalid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Brown</title>
		<link>http://communikaytrix.com/2009/10/27/we%e2%80%99re-both-on-twitter-so-we-must-be-bffs/comment-page-1/#comment-299</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Danny Brown]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 00:25:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://communikaytrix.com/?p=327#comment-299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But wouldn&#039;t Seth had to have accepted the friendship first? In which case, his argument takes a little nose-dive into the Mississippi... ;-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But wouldn&#8217;t Seth had to have accepted the friendship first? In which case, his argument takes a little nose-dive into the Mississippi&#8230; <img src='http://s1.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AubreyMondi</title>
		<link>http://communikaytrix.com/2009/10/27/we%e2%80%99re-both-on-twitter-so-we-must-be-bffs/comment-page-1/#comment-298</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AubreyMondi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 18:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://communikaytrix.com/?p=327#comment-298</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have a great example of this, but it&#039;s sort of backwards.  Two weeks ago, I attended a PRSA event, and sat at a table with a bunch of wonderful young professionals, just like myself.  We chatted and networked, all nice and what not, just like we were supposed to.

When I got on Twitter later that night, I realized the girl I sat across the table from, (and probably had the best, REAL conversation with) was already following me on Twitter - and vice versa. 

As in, before the event, before we ever saw each other&#039;s faces, we &quot;knew&quot; one another, but didn&#039;t take advantage of it.

I&#039;m glad I know her voice now, and am equally glad I met her in person.  Now if we ever RT one another, at least I know who she &quot;really&quot; is.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a great example of this, but it&#8217;s sort of backwards.  Two weeks ago, I attended a PRSA event, and sat at a table with a bunch of wonderful young professionals, just like myself.  We chatted and networked, all nice and what not, just like we were supposed to.</p>
<p>When I got on Twitter later that night, I realized the girl I sat across the table from, (and probably had the best, REAL conversation with) was already following me on Twitter &#8211; and vice versa. </p>
<p>As in, before the event, before we ever saw each other&#8217;s faces, we &#8220;knew&#8221; one another, but didn&#8217;t take advantage of it.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad I know her voice now, and am equally glad I met her in person.  Now if we ever RT one another, at least I know who she &#8220;really&#8221; is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: communikaytrix</title>
		<link>http://communikaytrix.com/2009/10/27/we%e2%80%99re-both-on-twitter-so-we-must-be-bffs/comment-page-1/#comment-297</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[communikaytrix]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 18:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://communikaytrix.com/?p=327#comment-297</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Justin - Yes, I personally don&#039;t think Twitter is the best place for a pitch, but some people do disagree. To me that&#039;s where the build up happens.  I&#039;d love to hear from some journalists in their takes.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Justin &#8211; Yes, I personally don&#8217;t think Twitter is the best place for a pitch, but some people do disagree. To me that&#8217;s where the build up happens.  I&#8217;d love to hear from some journalists in their takes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: communikaytrix</title>
		<link>http://communikaytrix.com/2009/10/27/we%e2%80%99re-both-on-twitter-so-we-must-be-bffs/comment-page-1/#comment-296</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[communikaytrix]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 18:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://communikaytrix.com/?p=327#comment-296</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Completely agree with you. I&#039;ve never understood the interest in publicly sharing a story idea - no benefit for the reporter or the client!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Completely agree with you. I&#8217;ve never understood the interest in publicly sharing a story idea &#8211; no benefit for the reporter or the client!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

